french

Little Linguists

Janitors have been fired because they cannot read an after-hours note with special clean-up instructions. Families have been evicted from their apartment when the apartment owner falsely claimed that the rental contract allows eviction if a crying baby disturbs other tenants; the evicted tenants do not object fearing their illiteracy will be exposed. The taking of medicines poses a danger to those who cannot read the instructions on the medicine bottles. Children who have medical emergencies face life-and-death situations if their illiterate parents have become lost because they cannot read the street signs.

These and hundreds of similar “horror stories” occur all around us every day — most of them without our knowledge because functional illiterates are extremely good at hiding their illiteracy. Illiterates cannot get by in our complex society as well as they should and must constantly endure at least thirty-four different kinds of serious physical, financial, and emotional problems. Many simple tasks we take for granted are impossible for illiterates.

The shocking 1993 report with the title Adult Literacy in America was the most extensive study of illiteracy ever commissioned by the U.S. government. It was a five-year, $14 million study involving lengthy interviews of 26,049 U.S. adults statistically chosen to represent the entire U.S. population. It grouped interviewees into five groups according to their ability to read. The report shows that the average yearly earnings were: Level 1 (the least literate), $2105; Level 2, $5225; Level 3, $9090, and Levels 4 and 5 combined, $16,311. The threshold poverty level for an individual in 1993 was $7363 per year. Shockingly, 22 percent of U.S. adults were Level 1 and 26.7 percent were Level 2. This indicates that 48.7 percent of U.S. adults had average annual earnings SIGNIFICANTLY below the poverty level, mostly because of their functional illiteracy.

The report of a study done by the same group who did the 1993 study was issued in 2006 showing no significant improvement over the 1993 results.

We do not see 48.7 percent of U.S. adults in poverty because most households have more than one employed adult and because low-income households receive financial assistance from the government (from our taxes) or from family, friends, and charities.

Benefits of Ending Illiteracy

  • You will benefit emotionally if you are concerned that people you know are — or will be — functionally illiterate.
  • You will benefit if you object to an average personal cost of $5186 each year as a result of illiteracy for (1) taxes for government programs that illiterates use and for the truancy, juvenile delinquency, and crime directly related to illiteracy and (2) higher prices for consumer goods due to illiterates in the workplace.
  • You will benefit if you are employed or if you have financial interests in a business or organization in which you invest time or money. Illiteracy affects all organizations to some extent, some of them seriously.
  • You will benefit if our nation improves the trade balance, national relationships, and our national employment by improving communication between nations.

The Solution to Illiteracy

Linguists tell us that Dr. Johnson made a very serious linguistic error in preparing his dictionary in 1755. Instead of freezing the spelling of the sounds of the English language, he froze the spelling of words. Present-day English is thus based upon the spelling of words from the languages of eight nations who occupied the British Isles before 1755.

Professor Julius Nyikos found that there are at least 1768 ways of spelling forty sounds in English! There is not even one invariable spelling rule in English — some of the exceptions have exceptions! As a result, every word in a person’s vocabulary must be learned, one at a time, either by rote memory or by repeated use. As a result, many scholars believe the obvious solution to English illiteracy is spelling reform.

Consider these facts about spelling reform:

  • Dozens of scholars for over 250 years have recommended it.
  • Several nations, smaller and larger than the U.S., both advanced and third-world, have simplified their spelling.
  • A simpler spelling system has been proven effective for making learning to read easier in more than 300 alphabetic languages but never tried in English. In 295 languages (at least 98% of them) students become fluent readers in less than three months. Most of the approx. 51 percent of U.S. adults who do become functionally literate require two to four YEARS.
  • All reasonable objections to spelling reform have been thoroughly debunked by several distinguished linguists and educators.
  • The need is greater than ever in our increasingly complex world, but it has never been tried in English.

The new book, Let’s End Our Literacy Crisis, details a recently proposed spelling reform called NuEnglish which is scientifically designed to use the spelling of every sound (1) as it is most often spelled in English, as are 82% of the NuEnglish spellings of the sounds, (2) as people expect a certain sound to be spelled, as in all of the other spellings, and (3) uses a perfect one-to-one ratio of letters-to-sounds. Many years of research examining dozens of spelling reform proposals has not revealed any other spelling reform proposal which has even one of these characteristics.

To learn NuEnglish, students only need to learn the spelling of 38 sounds instead of all 20,000 or more words in their reading vocabulary. It is so simple that present readers of English have learned NuEnglish spelling in about five minutes.

Adoption of NuEnglish will enable about 600 million of the more than 1.3 billion English-speaking people around the world who cannot read English very well — over 93 million in the U.S. alone — to be able to learn to read English in less than three months, as they do in almost all other alphabetic languages. Without adoption of NuEnglish, based upon present statistics, less than two percent of U.S. adult illiterates will ever become fluent readers.

(C) Copyright 2009 Bob C. Cleckler — All Rights Reserved Worldwide

Bob C. Cleckler,
CEO of Literacy Research Assoc., Inc.,
Vice Pres. of R & D of NuEnglish, Inc.,
author of 4 published books on ending illiteracy.

Let’s End Our Literacy Crisis, (LEOLC) rev. ed., published in mid-2009 by American University & Colleges Press, was entered in the education category of two major book award competitions, each with over 1000 total entrants. It was one of six finalists in one competition and one of eight finalists in the other. By applying the proposals in LEOLC, we can definitely and permanently end functional illiteracy.

Professor of Special Education at Eastern New Mexico University, Michael F. Shaughnessy, Ph.D. read LEOLC and emailed the author, “I agree with you 100%!” Carefully, honestly read all of this amazing book and you will too.

LEOLC describes the revolutionary spelling system, NuEnglish, in which the spelling of only 38 sounds is needed. And 82% of these sounds are spelled as they are MOST OFTEN spelled in English and the rest are spelled the way they are EXPECTED to be spelled. (For example we expect the letter F to have the sound as in “fan.” but more often it has the V sound entirely because of the common word “of.” There is a perfect one-to-one relation of sound to spelling.

For more infomation see http://nuenglish.org This website has a free Respeller program which will convert up to about 25 pages of English material to NuEnglish in a few seconds and flag English words not in the database, and for book infomation see http://nuenglish.com It is also available from Amazon.com.

Literacy Research Associates, Inc. based in Salt Lake City, Utah and NuEnglish, Inc. based in Phoenix, Arizona are both non-profit educational corporations. NuEnglish, Inc. is also a 509(a)(2) public charity.

Filed under Uncategorized by on . Comment#

Foreign Language Immersion

How would listening to a foreign language help a person learn that language?

I got my daughter a bunch of kids’ music CDs and one of them has nursery rhyme kind of songs in English and then in French and it’s called something like “Sing & Learn.” How would she ever learn even a little bit of French from that? It’s not like she knows which words in French correlate to which words in English. I certainly don’t, anyway. :)

*I don’t care if she learns French, by the way, just thought it would be good to expose her to the sound of another language and they didn’t have the Spanish version. :) And I’m just curious. I can understand the idea of learning through immersion but not just listening to it.

this isn’t exactly comparable to just listening to music, but I’ve had several [college-aged] friends who have studied abroad in both France and Italy. some did not know the language at all, most had a bit of a grasp on the basics (ex. I am good, how are you, where is the bathroom?); they all learned the language well enough to communicate within 2 months. but like you said, being immersed in the language is different than just hearing bits of it in the day. BUT I’d think that kids are much more able to learn a language and connect two languages together than adults are — I’d say she’d probably understand it fairly soon if she listens to them consistently. she’ll learn the language patterns; French is very similar to English in that there is a subject and a predicate (like all the Romance languages). if she’s got the English version to compare it to, I’d think she’d match them up fairly quickly if she’s listening to (and interested in) it often.

you should learn a few words in French too, it might facilitate her learning bits of the language a little quicker.

Filed under Uncategorized by on . Comment#

How To Speak French

Are you too busy for French school? Don’t worry because you can learn to speak French online! There are courses online that are offered to anyone who is willing to learn however you need to be determined If your determined them this article is for you. Some courses are free and some are paid.

So if you want to learn to speak French online I have one question for you and that is how determined are you? Seriously? There are free French online courses and paid ones. I recommend paid ones from past experience. Free French courses will help you learn French but I can guarantee you that you will forget about it after awhile. Free online courses just don’t provide what a paid one does. There are usually a limited amount of sentences that you can learn and many don’t have sound, so you don’t know whether you are pronouncing it right or wrong. I have tried free courses and I had to go through so many different websites and then cut and paste sentences into Microsoft word to learn. Funny thing is I tried to speak to my friend and they didn’t even understand me, what a waste of time! By the end of it I nearly wanted to give up.

Then you got your paid learn to speak French online courses which is a lot better structured than ANY free one. I decided to pay for one and I honestly tell you know it was the best money spent. Why? They provide you with everything you need from greetings to asking for directions to having complex conversations. The best part is there are audio tracks and usually a support team to guide you if you have any trouble.

So this is how I was able to learn to speak French online. Now going back to the question I asked you. How determined are you? The only way I was able to be fluent in French was because I was determined to learn it. I guarantee if you are determined to learn it you can and will very fast.

There’s no reason why you should have to spend months trying to learn French. Click here to get the information you need to effectively learn how to speak French fast. Join thousands who have been successful in learning this language and enjoyed it!

Filed under Uncategorized by on . Comment#

French Lessons

French Language Courses – Which One Should I Choose?

There are many French language courses on the market today. Which one to choose seems to be somewhat of a dilemma. This article will speak about five different French language courses in order for you to make an informed decision about which one to choose.

Check Them Out!

1. Lingo Course – This is how tourists, professional business people and immigrants can go from knowing just one language to being bilingual in no time flat. You can do it, too, with Lingo Basics. Unlike other French language courses, Lingo Basics is a set of e-books that downloads right onto your computer.

2. Pimsleur French Software – The Pimsleur method of learning French involves all-audio courses that you will find on both cassette and CD. The lessons are meant for daily use and should take ½ hour to complete. What makes this different from other French language courses is that each lesson starts with a conversation that is being carried on between two native French speakers. An instructor then starts to prompt the listener to repeat word and phrases that were just heard. Due to the fact that French pronunciation is of vital importance, this is one reason why the Pimsleur French language course is so good. The one drawback to this course is that is all audio and has very little reading practice with it. Some supplemental reading material may be needed as the French written word can vary considerably from the French spoken word.

3. Rosetta Stone French language course – This course will enable you to communicate as well as to connect with the world. You will be able to build a foundation of basic vocabulary and language structure that is of prime importance. You will be able to develop enough French language skills to be able to enjoy social interactions such as shopping and travel and you will learn how to share your opinions and ideas in French. When you open up your French language course, you will find your own CD-ROM software for all 3 levels (can be used with Windows/Mac), a user’s guide, a USB headset with microphone, as well as an audio companion or a multiple-CD set to be able to play or download to your own MP3 player.

4. Rocket French language course – The Rocket French course has its focus mainly on the audio format of listening and repeating. However, it also has video and games online as well. This program includes thirteen hours of audio that can be downloaded to an MP3 player or can be listened to on a computer. This is a convenience that you have with this program of taking it with you when you are out driving in your car or going out for a brisk walk. If you wish to view the games on your computer, you will find that they tie in with the lessons. It actually gives you the same information but in a new and different format so that reinforcement can take place that will allow you to learn French online. This course differs from other French language courses in that it is quite flexible and will allow you to work at your own pace so you are not pressed to finish a chapter in a limited amount of time. Traditional teaching methods are used, but they are presented in a clear and concise manner.

5. Fluenz French Program – This program is divided into sessions that have an introduction by an on-screen tutor. The tutor will give a full syllabus on all new structures and words that will be learned in that particular session. Next will come a series of challenging workouts that will provide a great training ground for developing the learner’s writing, speaking, reading and listening skills. You will find that in this French language course a full set of clear, common sense tools will be introduced that will make a true difference.

Narrowing Down the Field

Thus far, you have learned about five different French language courses. However, making a decision may be difficult. You may want to take some time out to investigate the differences between the Rosetta Stone and Rocket programs.Out of the field of choices you have before you these two products take the cake.

Miriam Price has had a vast amount of knowledge and experience in different languages and programs. For a closer favorable Rocket and Rosetta french language courses Software, check out her resourceful site now.

Filed under Uncategorized by on . Comment#